197 Zeilen
4.1 KiB
Markdown
197 Zeilen
4.1 KiB
Markdown
# VG-Environment — Workspace Model
|
|
|
|
## Purpose of workspace separation
|
|
|
|
VG-Environment intentionally uses multiple workspaces and chats as architectural boundaries.
|
|
|
|
The separation is not organizational overhead.
|
|
|
|
It exists to:
|
|
- reduce context overload
|
|
- protect architectural clarity
|
|
- separate responsibilities
|
|
- prevent feature drift
|
|
- keep modules understandable
|
|
- avoid uncontrolled coupling
|
|
- maintain long-term project coherence
|
|
|
|
Workspaces are therefore treated as:
|
|
intentional architectural control structures.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Role of orchestration
|
|
|
|
Orchestration is responsible for:
|
|
- architectural direction
|
|
- project coherence
|
|
- responsibility boundaries
|
|
- long-term consistency
|
|
- strategic prioritization
|
|
- preventing uncontrolled feature growth
|
|
- protecting Observe/Analysis separation
|
|
|
|
Orchestration is NOT:
|
|
- the primary implementation workspace
|
|
- the primary Codex coding workspace
|
|
- the place for uncontrolled experimentation
|
|
|
|
Implementation decisions should follow architectural guidance,
|
|
not replace it.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## VG-Core
|
|
|
|
VG-Core contains neutral infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
- storage infrastructure
|
|
- export infrastructure
|
|
- helper utilities
|
|
- platform abstractions
|
|
- reusable technical primitives
|
|
- runtime-independent shared logic
|
|
|
|
VG-Core should remain:
|
|
- generic
|
|
- reusable
|
|
- technically neutral
|
|
|
|
VG-Core must avoid:
|
|
- Observe-specific UX logic
|
|
- analysis heuristics
|
|
- interpretation logic
|
|
- feature-specific UI coupling
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## VG-Observe
|
|
|
|
VG-Observe is responsible for runtime visibility and technical evidence observation.
|
|
|
|
Observe focuses on:
|
|
- technically observable browser behavior
|
|
- consent-state visibility
|
|
- request observation
|
|
- runtime reconstruction
|
|
- evidence-oriented presentation
|
|
- technical temporal relations
|
|
|
|
Observe answers:
|
|
"What was technically observed?"
|
|
|
|
Observe must remain:
|
|
- technically grounded
|
|
- reproducible
|
|
- explainable
|
|
- interpretation-minimal
|
|
|
|
Observe must NOT drift into:
|
|
- speculative analysis
|
|
- scoring systems
|
|
- behavioral interpretation
|
|
- legal evaluation
|
|
- hidden heuristics
|
|
- AI-generated assumptions
|
|
|
|
Observe is evidence-oriented,
|
|
not conclusion-oriented.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## VG-Analysis
|
|
|
|
VG-Analysis is intentionally separated from Observe.
|
|
|
|
Analysis is responsible for:
|
|
- interpretation
|
|
- discrepancy analysis
|
|
- pattern recognition
|
|
- higher-level correlation models
|
|
- hypothesis generation
|
|
- analytical reconstruction
|
|
|
|
Analysis answers:
|
|
"What could this technically mean?"
|
|
|
|
Analysis may operate on:
|
|
- aggregated observations
|
|
- reconstructed sequences
|
|
- comparison logic
|
|
- repeated runtime behavior
|
|
- later evidence evaluation
|
|
|
|
Observe must not silently absorb Analysis responsibilities.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## VG-Graph
|
|
|
|
VG-Graph is responsible for relationship and network visualization.
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
- origin relationships
|
|
- vendor relationships
|
|
- consent propagation structures
|
|
- communication topology
|
|
- runtime interaction visualization
|
|
|
|
VG-Graph should visualize existing observations,
|
|
not invent meaning.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## VG-Block
|
|
|
|
VG-Block is intentionally separated from observation logic.
|
|
|
|
VG-Block may later contain:
|
|
- blocking logic
|
|
- rewrite/testing logic
|
|
- intervention tooling
|
|
- experimental runtime manipulation
|
|
|
|
Observation and intervention must remain separated.
|
|
|
|
A system should not silently modify the same runtime it documents.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Workspace evolution
|
|
|
|
Additional workspaces are expected over time.
|
|
|
|
Workspace splitting is considered healthy when:
|
|
- context overload increases
|
|
- responsibilities blur
|
|
- architecture becomes unstable
|
|
- implementation and orchestration begin mixing
|
|
- Observe and Analysis start overlapping
|
|
|
|
Workspace separation is therefore treated as:
|
|
a stability mechanism,
|
|
not a workflow inconvenience.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Long-term architectural principle
|
|
|
|
VG-Environment is intended to evolve as:
|
|
- a technically understandable
|
|
- evidence-oriented
|
|
- locally controlled
|
|
- reproducible
|
|
- inspectable
|
|
|
|
runtime reconstruction environment.
|
|
|
|
The project must resist:
|
|
- uncontrolled architecture expansion
|
|
- feature accumulation without user value
|
|
- hidden complexity growth
|
|
- loss of explainability
|
|
- blurred module responsibilities
|
|
|
|
Architectural clarity is considered a core project asset.
|